April 26, 2011

Is it too Late for the Spurs?

Filed under: Uncategorized — wwinston @ 10:05 am

The Spurs are probably going to lose the series to the Grizzlies. It did not have to be this way. Our Adjusted +/- ratings for the series have shown that Bonner (-9 points and -53 Impact) and Neal (-22 points and -52 Impact) have killed the Spurs. This has been clear after two games. Blair (+6 points, +5 Impact) has played ok. Yet Bonner averages 20 minutes, Neal 19 and Blair 12 minutes? Virtually every bad lineup for Spurs has Neal or Bonner in. See below. Maybe its not too late, but better playing time decisions sure would have helped. With Neal and Bonner out Spurs play 20 points better than average per 48 minutes. With either in they play 8 points worse than average.

 

1  Duncan      Ginobili    Jefferson   McDyess     Parker        29.75    33.53  MEM  SAS*     22.91    16        1448_SAS_2011

    2  Bonner      Duncan      Hill        Jefferson   Parker        -4.39    14.51  MEM  SAS*    -13.25    -4        1228_SAS_2011

    3  Duncan      Hill        Jefferson   McDyess     Parker        -7.19    12.74  MEM  SAS*    -15.08    -4        1480_SAS_2011

    4  Blair       Bonner      Ginobili    Hill        Neal         -12.00    10.82  MEM  SAS*    -13.31    -3         614_SAS_2011

    5  Bonner      Duncan      Hill        Jefferson   Neal         -67.67     9.25  MEM  SAS*    -77.83   -15         716_SAS_2011

    6  Blair       Duncan      Hill        Jefferson   Parker        77.36     8.56  MEM  SAS*     72.93    13        1226_SAS_2011

    7  Duncan      Hill        McDyess     Neal        Parker       -44.12     8.14  MEM  SAS*    -53.16    -9        1864_SAS_2011

    8  Duncan      Ginobili    Hill        Jefferson   McDyess       30.90     7.72  MEM  SAS*     18.66     3         488_SAS_2011

    9  Bonner      Ginobili    Hill        Jefferson   Splitter     -49.34     6.82  MEM  SAS*    -63.37    -9        4324_SAS_2011

   10  Blair       Bonner      Jefferson   Neal        Parker       -21.32     6.79  MEM  SAS*    -28.29    -4        1670_SAS_2011

 

                                                                    RATING  MINUTES               SIMPLE     ±        LINEUP CODE#

 

   11  Duncan      Jefferson   McDyess     Neal        Parker       -65.53     6.48  MEM  SAS*    -74.03   -10        1928_SAS_2011

   12  Blair       Neal        Splitter    Green       Novak         11.34     5.72  MEM  SAS*     16.79     2      299522_SAS_2011

   13  Duncan      Ginobili    Hill        McDyess     Parker       -18.74     5.30  MEM  SAS*    -27.17    -3        1384_SAS_2011

   14  Bonner      Duncan      Ginobili    Hill        Neal          19.40     4.89  MEM  SAS*      9.72     1         620_SAS_2011

   15  Bonner      Duncan      Ginobili    Jefferson   Parker        -5.28     4.61  MEM  SAS*    -20.85    -2        1196_SAS_2011

   16  Duncan      Ginobili    Hill        McDyess     Neal          19.51     4.18  MEM  SAS*     11.45     1         872_SAS_2011

   17  Blair       Bonner      Hill        Neal        Parker       108.96     3.74  MEM  SAS*    102.86     8        1606_SAS_201

4 Comments »

  1. Lol, didn’t need +- to tell me Bonnar shouldn’t be playing more than ten minutes, no matter how bad the Spurs defense is, he makes it 50% worse.

    Comment by Tony — April 26, 2011 @ 1:40 pm

  2. [...] Is it too Late for the Spurs?: Wayne Winston of Mathletics thinks so, but he uses +/- to show that it didn’t have to be that way. Also of note: Winston’s playoff team ratings. [...]

    Pingback by Is it too Late for the Spurs? » Stathead » Blog Archive — April 26, 2011 @ 5:02 pm

  3. what do these #s mean

    6 Blair Duncan Hill Jefferson Parker 77.36 8.56

    Comment by Rob — April 27, 2011 @ 2:53 am

  4. what are the variances on these figures?

    Comment by Rob — April 27, 2011 @ 2:54 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress