|
Rank
|
Team
|
Off
|
Def
|
Rating
|
Off Rank
|
Def Rank
|
|
1
|
San Antonio Spurs
|
-0.46
|
-13.22
|
12.76
|
21
|
1
|
|
2
|
Golden State Warriors
|
12.07
|
2.29
|
9.79
|
1
|
20
|
|
3
|
Oklahoma City Thunder
|
7.13
|
0.10
|
7.03
|
2
|
17
|
|
4
|
Boston Celtics
|
2.22
|
-2.21
|
4.43
|
6
|
9
|
|
5
|
Toronto Raptors
|
-0.95
|
-4.29
|
3.33
|
23
|
4
|
|
6
|
Los Angeles Clippers
|
2.56
|
-0.63
|
3.19
|
4
|
13
|
|
7
|
Chicago Bulls
|
0.01
|
-3.01
|
3.02
|
14
|
6
|
|
8
|
Indiana Pacers
|
2.53
|
-0.22
|
2.75
|
5
|
14
|
|
9
|
Orlando Magic
|
-0.22
|
-2.56
|
2.34
|
20
|
7
|
|
10
|
Detroit Pistons
|
-0.54
|
-2.47
|
1.93
|
22
|
8
|
|
11
|
Miami Heat
|
-3.55
|
-5.18
|
1.62
|
25
|
3
|
|
12
|
Atlanta Hawks
|
0.70
|
-0.89
|
1.59
|
10
|
11
|
|
13
|
Charlotte Hornets
|
-0.10
|
-1.52
|
1.42
|
17
|
10
|
|
14
|
Utah Jazz
|
-4.58
|
-5.46
|
0.88
|
28
|
2
|
|
15
|
Cleveland Cavaliers
|
0.45
|
0.00
|
0.44
|
11
|
15
|
|
16
|
Dallas Mavericks
|
-0.19
|
0.07
|
-0.26
|
18
|
16
|
|
17
|
Portland Trail Blazers
|
0.70
|
1.47
|
-0.77
|
9
|
18
|
|
18
|
Memphis Grizzlies
|
-4.54
|
-3.10
|
-1.44
|
27
|
5
|
|
19
|
Houston Rockets
|
2.80
|
4.67
|
-1.87
|
3
|
29
|
|
20
|
Phoenix Suns
|
1.05
|
3.43
|
-2.38
|
8
|
24
|
|
21
|
Denver Nuggets
|
-0.21
|
2.54
|
-2.75
|
19
|
22
|
|
22
|
New York Knicks
|
-3.83
|
-0.80
|
-3.02
|
26
|
12
|
|
23
|
Minnesota Timberwolves
|
0.03
|
3.34
|
-3.31
|
13
|
23
|
|
24
|
Sacramento Kings
|
2.20
|
6.23
|
-4.03
|
7
|
30
|
|
25
|
Washington Wizards
|
-0.01
|
4.19
|
-4.20
|
16
|
26
|
|
26
|
New Orleans Pelicans
|
0.05
|
4.44
|
-4.39
|
12
|
27
|
|
27
|
Los Angeles Lakers
|
0.00
|
4.62
|
-4.62
|
15
|
28
|
|
28
|
Milwaukee Bucks
|
-3.46
|
2.44
|
-5.90
|
24
|
21
|
|
29
|
Brooklyn Nets
|
-4.63
|
1.68
|
-6.30
|
29
|
19
|
|
30
|
Philadelphia 76ers
|
-7.22
|
4.04
|
-11.26
|
30
|
25
|
January 2, 2016
NBa Ratings jAN 2
4 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Hi Wayne. I am chewing on an issue with RAPM and RPM and wanted to check against your APM. What APM estimates do you currently have for the OKC starters as individuals and what rating does the lineup get when APM is run at lineup level? Would appreciate the assist.
Comment by Crow — January 4, 2016 @ 2:53 pm
Also, would you consider your APM at this point to be “pure”? I recall you had a separate rating to address crunchtime performance. Do you have any philosophical or practical issues with the application of regularization in general or as implemented in RAPM or RPM? If you have addressed before, a link would be helpful.
Comment by Crow — January 4, 2016 @ 2:58 pm
we have a different way of doing it. if you user SPSS or SAS yo uwill run into major issues.
Comment by wwinston — January 4, 2016 @ 3:36 pm
Starting lineup APM is +17.3. KD 13.6 RW 5.1, Ibaka 4.5 Roberson -8.3
Adams-3.9
Comment by wwinston — January 4, 2016 @ 3:37 pm