Here arechances each team wins 0,1,2,3,4,5 or 6 games.
Team |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Louisville |
0.0029 |
0.1892 |
0.1603 |
0.1812 |
0.1403 |
0.1097 |
0.2164 |
Florida |
0.0309 |
0.1894 |
0.2388 |
0.2071 |
0.1163 |
0.0908 |
0.1267 |
Indiana |
0.0236 |
0.2178 |
0.2203 |
0.1366 |
0.1736 |
0.1062 |
0.1219 |
Kansas |
0.0209 |
0.2714 |
0.2302 |
0.2169 |
0.107 |
0.0743 |
0.0793 |
Gonzaga |
0.0074 |
0.3568 |
0.2179 |
0.1588 |
0.1343 |
0.0586 |
0.0662 |
Ohio State |
0.088 |
0.2576 |
0.1995 |
0.1972 |
0.1376 |
0.0589 |
0.0612 |
Duke |
0.0352 |
0.294 |
0.2511 |
0.224 |
0.0858 |
0.0533 |
0.0566 |
Georgetown |
0.0788 |
0.2687 |
0.3609 |
0.1405 |
0.0707 |
0.0454 |
0.035 |
Syracuse |
0.083 |
0.2665 |
0.3769 |
0.1048 |
0.0937 |
0.0449 |
0.0302 |
Michigan St. |
0.1736 |
0.2593 |
0.2717 |
0.1776 |
0.0562 |
0.0344 |
0.0272 |
Michigan |
0.1293 |
0.2808 |
0.3224 |
0.1454 |
0.0638 |
0.0326 |
0.0257 |
Miami |
0.1014 |
0.2737 |
0.221 |
0.2354 |
0.1015 |
0.0429 |
0.0241 |
Wisconsin |
0.3181 |
0.2346 |
0.2422 |
0.0904 |
0.0683 |
0.0259 |
0.0205 |
Pittsburgh |
0.2911 |
0.4137 |
0.121 |
0.0862 |
0.0516 |
0.0192 |
0.0172 |
Marquette |
0.2809 |
0.2301 |
0.2326 |
0.1609 |
0.065 |
0.02 |
0.0105 |
New Mexico |
0.1606 |
0.3522 |
0.2817 |
0.125 |
0.0542 |
0.0164 |
0.0099 |
St. Louis |
0.2033 |
0.3381 |
0.3232 |
0.0775 |
0.0309 |
0.0174 |
0.0096 |
Kansas St. |
0.3055 |
0.3766 |
0.201 |
0.0652 |
0.0347 |
0.0103 |
0.0067 |
Arizona |
0.3535 |
0.3053 |
0.2053 |
0.083 |
0.0368 |
0.0102 |
0.0059 |
UNC |
0.3643 |
0.425 |
0.1031 |
0.0706 |
0.0204 |
0.0109 |
0.0057 |
Okla. St. |
0.3486 |
0.3035 |
0.2563 |
0.0535 |
0.023 |
0.0099 |
0.0052 |
Missouri |
0.3817 |
0.4831 |
0.0623 |
0.041 |
0.0176 |
0.0093 |
0.005 |
St. Mary’s |
0.5795 |
0.1941 |
0.1206 |
0.0596 |
0.0287 |
0.0106 |
0.0044 |
ND |
0.3968 |
0.3891 |
0.1032 |
0.0691 |
0.0279 |
0.0096 |
0.0043 |
Creighton |
0.4184 |
0.3734 |
0.1143 |
0.0648 |
0.0175 |
0.0074 |
0.0042 |
NC State |
0.3332 |
0.4821 |
0.0981 |
0.0416 |
0.0307 |
0.0109 |
0.0034 |
VCU |
0.3178 |
0.391 |
0.1934 |
0.0644 |
0.0219 |
0.0083 |
0.0032 |
Memphis |
0.4146 |
0.351 |
0.1452 |
0.0647 |
0.0164 |
0.0053 |
0.0028 |
UNLV |
0.404 |
0.3817 |
0.1556 |
0.035 |
0.017 |
0.0052 |
0.0015 |
Illinois |
0.4681 |
0.3365 |
0.102 |
0.0703 |
0.0173 |
0.0044 |
0.0014 |
San Diego St. |
0.4439 |
0.36 |
0.1447 |
0.0341 |
0.0113 |
0.0048 |
0.0012 |
Minn |
0.4396 |
0.4278 |
0.0787 |
0.0362 |
0.0109 |
0.0056 |
0.0012 |
Butler |
0.3726 |
0.3655 |
0.1617 |
0.0746 |
0.0201 |
0.0043 |
0.0012 |
Ole Miss |
0.6819 |
0.1688 |
0.1066 |
0.0272 |
0.011 |
0.0035 |
0.001 |
Cinncinati |
0.5816 |
0.3007 |
0.0709 |
0.0359 |
0.0071 |
0.0029 |
0.0009 |
Wichita St. |
0.7089 |
0.2223 |
0.0442 |
0.0152 |
0.007 |
0.0016 |
0.0008 |
Villanova |
0.6357 |
0.2849 |
0.0478 |
0.0234 |
0.0056 |
0.0019 |
0.0007 |
Oklahoma |
0.5561 |
0.3066 |
0.1061 |
0.0232 |
0.006 |
0.0013 |
0.0007 |
Colorado |
0.5319 |
0.3122 |
0.0872 |
0.0523 |
0.0125 |
0.0032 |
0.0007 |
Middle Tenn |
0.7778 |
0.1343 |
0.0561 |
0.0213 |
0.0071 |
0.0024 |
0.0007 |
Col. State |
0.6183 |
0.3248 |
0.0334 |
0.0151 |
0.006 |
0.0019 |
0.0005 |
UCLA |
0.5604 |
0.3563 |
0.0535 |
0.0223 |
0.0055 |
0.0016 |
0.0004 |
Temple |
0.6668 |
0.2789 |
0.0355 |
0.0116 |
0.0055 |
0.0014 |
0.0003 |
LASALLE |
0.8456 |
0.1109 |
0.0344 |
0.0067 |
0.002 |
0.0001 |
0.0003 |
Belmont |
0.6465 |
0.217 |
0.0991 |
0.028 |
0.0077 |
0.0015 |
0.0002 |
Davidson |
0.7191 |
0.154 |
0.0886 |
0.0297 |
0.0073 |
0.0011 |
0.0002 |
Oregon |
0.6514 |
0.2115 |
0.1141 |
0.0167 |
0.0045 |
0.0017 |
0.0001 |
Bucknell |
0.6274 |
0.2504 |
0.0885 |
0.0272 |
0.0056 |
0.0008 |
0.0001 |
Boise St. |
0.8489 |
0.1091 |
0.0325 |
0.0077 |
0.0016 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
Team |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Louisville |
0.0029 |
0.1892 |
0.1603 |
0.1812 |
0.1403 |
0.1097 |
0.2164 |
Florida |
0.0309 |
0.1894 |
0.2388 |
0.2071 |
0.1163 |
0.0908 |
0.1267 |
Indiana |
0.0236 |
0.2178 |
0.2203 |
0.1366 |
0.1736 |
0.1062 |
0.1219 |
Kansas |
0.0209 |
0.2714 |
0.2302 |
0.2169 |
0.107 |
0.0743 |
0.0793 |
Gonzaga |
0.0074 |
0.3568 |
0.2179 |
0.1588 |
0.1343 |
0.0586 |
0.0662 |
Ohio State |
0.088 |
0.2576 |
0.1995 |
0.1972 |
0.1376 |
0.0589 |
0.0612 |
Duke |
0.0352 |
0.294 |
0.2511 |
0.224 |
0.0858 |
0.0533 |
0.0566 |
Georgetown |
0.0788 |
0.2687 |
0.3609 |
0.1405 |
0.0707 |
0.0454 |
0.035 |
Syracuse |
0.083 |
0.2665 |
0.3769 |
0.1048 |
0.0937 |
0.0449 |
0.0302 |
Michigan St. |
0.1736 |
0.2593 |
0.2717 |
0.1776 |
0.0562 |
0.0344 |
0.0272 |
Michigan |
0.1293 |
0.2808 |
0.3224 |
0.1454 |
0.0638 |
0.0326 |
0.0257 |
Miami |
0.1014 |
0.2737 |
0.221 |
0.2354 |
0.1015 |
0.0429 |
0.0241 |
Wisconsin |
0.3181 |
0.2346 |
0.2422 |
0.0904 |
0.0683 |
0.0259 |
0.0205 |
Pittsburgh |
0.2911 |
0.4137 |
0.121 |
0.0862 |
0.0516 |
0.0192 |
0.0172 |
Marquette |
0.2809 |
0.2301 |
0.2326 |
0.1609 |
0.065 |
0.02 |
0.0105 |
New Mexico |
0.1606 |
0.3522 |
0.2817 |
0.125 |
0.0542 |
0.0164 |
0.0099 |
St. Louis |
0.2033 |
0.3381 |
0.3232 |
0.0775 |
0.0309 |
0.0174 |
0.0096 |
Kansas St. |
0.3055 |
0.3766 |
0.201 |
0.0652 |
0.0347 |
0.0103 |
0.0067 |
Arizona |
0.3535 |
0.3053 |
0.2053 |
0.083 |
0.0368 |
0.0102 |
0.0059 |
UNC |
0.3643 |
0.425 |
0.1031 |
0.0706 |
0.0204 |
0.0109 |
0.0057 |
Okla. St. |
0.3486 |
0.3035 |
0.2563 |
0.0535 |
0.023 |
0.0099 |
0.0052 |
Missouri |
0.3817 |
0.4831 |
0.0623 |
0.041 |
0.0176 |
0.0093 |
0.005 |
St. Mary’s |
0.5795 |
0.1941 |
0.1206 |
0.0596 |
0.0287 |
0.0106 |
0.0044 |
ND |
0.3968 |
0.3891 |
0.1032 |
0.0691 |
0.0279 |
0.0096 |
0.0043 |
Creighton |
0.4184 |
0.3734 |
0.1143 |
0.0648 |
0.0175 |
0.0074 |
0.0042 |
NC State |
0.3332 |
0.4821 |
0.0981 |
0.0416 |
0.0307 |
0.0109 |
0.0034 |
VCU |
0.3178 |
0.391 |
0.1934 |
0.0644 |
0.0219 |
0.0083 |
0.0032 |
Memphis |
0.4146 |
0.351 |
0.1452 |
0.0647 |
0.0164 |
0.0053 |
0.0028 |
UNLV |
0.404 |
0.3817 |
0.1556 |
0.035 |
0.017 |
0.0052 |
0.0015 |
Illinois |
0.4681 |
0.3365 |
0.102 |
0.0703 |
0.0173 |
0.0044 |
0.0014 |
San Diego St. |
0.4439 |
0.36 |
0.1447 |
0.0341 |
0.0113 |
0.0048 |
0.0012 |
Minn |
0.4396 |
0.4278 |
0.0787 |
0.0362 |
0.0109 |
0.0056 |
0.0012 |
Butler |
0.3726 |
0.3655 |
0.1617 |
0.0746 |
0.0201 |
0.0043 |
0.0012 |
Ole Miss |
0.6819 |
0.1688 |
0.1066 |
0.0272 |
0.011 |
0.0035 |
0.001 |
Cinncinati |
0.5816 |
0.3007 |
0.0709 |
0.0359 |
0.0071 |
0.0029 |
0.0009 |
Wichita St. |
0.7089 |
0.2223 |
0.0442 |
0.0152 |
0.007 |
0.0016 |
0.0008 |
Villanova |
0.6357 |
0.2849 |
0.0478 |
0.0234 |
0.0056 |
0.0019 |
0.0007 |
Oklahoma |
0.5561 |
0.3066 |
0.1061 |
0.0232 |
0.006 |
0.0013 |
0.0007 |
Colorado |
0.5319 |
0.3122 |
0.0872 |
0.0523 |
0.0125 |
0.0032 |
0.0007 |
Middle Tenn |
0.7778 |
0.1343 |
0.0561 |
0.0213 |
0.0071 |
0.0024 |
0.0007 |
Col. State |
0.6183 |
0.3248 |
0.0334 |
0.0151 |
0.006 |
0.0019 |
0.0005 |
UCLA |
0.5604 |
0.3563 |
0.0535 |
0.0223 |
0.0055 |
0.0016 |
0.0004 |
Temple |
0.6668 |
0.2789 |
0.0355 |
0.0116 |
0.0055 |
0.0014 |
0.0003 |
LASALLE |
0.8456 |
0.1109 |
0.0344 |
0.0067 |
0.002 |
0.0001 |
0.0003 |
Belmont |
0.6465 |
0.217 |
0.0991 |
0.028 |
0.0077 |
0.0015 |
0.0002 |
Davidson |
0.7191 |
0.154 |
0.0886 |
0.0297 |
0.0073 |
0.0011 |
0.0002 |
Oregon |
0.6514 |
0.2115 |
0.1141 |
0.0167 |
0.0045 |
0.0017 |
0.0001 |
Bucknell |
0.6274 |
0.2504 |
0.0885 |
0.0272 |
0.0056 |
0.0008 |
0.0001 |
Boise St. |
0.8489 |
0.1091 |
0.0325 |
0.0077 |
0.0016 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
Two questions.
1) Is this based on the Sagarin ratings?
2) Isn’t it be common for coaches to shorten their bench rotations, now that each game is extremely important? Are there any metrics to adjust for this?
Comment by Mike — March 18, 2013 @ 12:22 pm
Wayne - thanks for posting! Are there some teams missing from the final 64? I noticed a few missing like Harvard, Valpo, etc that aren’t part of the play-in games.
Comment by Justin — March 18, 2013 @ 2:34 pm
There are only 50 of the 68 teams here….
Comment by Mark — March 18, 2013 @ 5:32 pm
I like your NCAA stats and they helped me last year in my pool. But I don’t understand this year’s. How can Louisville’s percentage of winning a certain number of games go up-down-up-down. Shouldn’t there be a steady rise/decline?
Comment by Jeremy — March 18, 2013 @ 7:15 pm
Thanks very much for this. Are the probabilities for St Mary’s et al (the play in teams) reflect their chance of winning the ’round 1′ game?
Comment by Todd — March 18, 2013 @ 7:47 pm
Yes on Sagarin. I do not know how to adjust for shortening bench
Comment by wwinston — March 18, 2013 @ 9:23 pm
They are good in sagarin and do not have horrible bracket
Comment by wwinston — March 18, 2013 @ 9:24 pm
They just have no chance so I did not post them
Comment by wwinston — March 18, 2013 @ 9:24 pm
I left out teams that never won in 10,000 sims.
Comment by wwinston — March 18, 2013 @ 9:25 pm
It is chance they win exactly that number of games
Comment by wwinston — March 18, 2013 @ 9:25 pm
I simulated play in game but did not count it in number of wins so 1 win for play in team means they win on Thursday or Friday and then go out
Comment by wwinston — March 18, 2013 @ 9:26 pm
Professor Winston,
Did you use a two-way data table to come up with these probabilities? How can I re-create your probability table in Excel? Thanks very much!
Comment by Patrick — March 20, 2013 @ 2:19 pm
@risk addin
Comment by wwinston — March 20, 2013 @ 3:37 pm
everybody has them around 12%. they are better than most teams seeded above them
Comment by wwinston — March 20, 2013 @ 3:38 pm
The layout is clear and obvious which is great .. Wondering if you can use a similar format to predict the final four? From there, it’s really about who gets hot and emotions/momentum during the Sweet 16 weekend really matter .. I only see Florida right now as a “cinderella” in 2013 and upsets always happen .. Do you add in a “luck” element or “tempo” like the site below?
http://kenpom.com/index.php
I think Georgetown, Syracuse, and Ohio State should be higher and Gonzaga should be way, way lower than 6%.
The “Help” section outlines kenpom’s model in more detail. Maybe helpful for you
Comment by Raj Laroia — March 22, 2013 @ 1:29 am
By the way, you were quoted in WSJ the other day .. Your work is getting international interest
Comment by Raj Laroia — March 22, 2013 @ 1:31 am
so how many simulations would it take for FGCU to win 1,2,3 times?
Comment by xangoir — March 27, 2013 @ 11:37 am