<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brandon Rush vs. Troy Murphy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?p=529</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?p=529&#038;cpage=1#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?p=529#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>Murphy is in a 4 way for third for number of appearances on the 7 lineups that are positive on Adjusted +/- and used over 30 minutes.  Not enough to fully excuse his overall Adjusted +/- of course, but suggesting that even questionable or bad players can work some of the time- if that lineup is a good overall design or lucky or some of both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murphy is in a 4 way for third for number of appearances on the 7 lineups that are positive on Adjusted +/- and used over 30 minutes.  Not enough to fully excuse his overall Adjusted +/- of course, but suggesting that even questionable or bad players can work some of the time- if that lineup is a good overall design or lucky or some of both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?p=529&#038;cpage=1#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?p=529#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>(I guess they are slightly above average at getting to the line as well. Rush is hurting them there.)

At basketballvalue the Pacers have 7 lineups that are positive on Adjusted +/- and used over 30 minutes. Bigs errors of course, but Rush is on all 7 of them. Granger next at 5. I'd get that kind of stuff some weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I guess they are slightly above average at getting to the line as well. Rush is hurting them there.)</p>
<p>At basketballvalue the Pacers have 7 lineups that are positive on Adjusted +/- and used over 30 minutes. Bigs errors of course, but Rush is on all 7 of them. Granger next at 5. I&#8217;d get that kind of stuff some weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?p=529&#038;cpage=1#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waynewinston.com/wordpress/?p=529#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>By 1 on 1 counterpart defense and overall Defensive Adjusted it appears B Rush may be a bit better than average on defense. Further, the Adjusted Factors at hoopnumbers from last season lists him as being in the top 10% specifically on impact on opponent eFG%.  The only thing the Pacers are doing right this season is shot defense. It isn't enough, but Rush is probably helping with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By 1 on 1 counterpart defense and overall Defensive Adjusted it appears B Rush may be a bit better than average on defense. Further, the Adjusted Factors at hoopnumbers from last season lists him as being in the top 10% specifically on impact on opponent eFG%.  The only thing the Pacers are doing right this season is shot defense. It isn&#8217;t enough, but Rush is probably helping with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
